Kim in Rome - the Peter Consciousness

Hi guys,

Who's been following Kim's dictations from Rome? I found the teachings on the "Peter consciousness" really fascinating. I'd like to multiply the talents and share my own perspective on this state of consiousness.

The Peter consciousness is where a being intuitively senses the truth radiating from someone who has reached a level of Christ consciousness - yet has not fully internalized it, not become one with it. It's the next step up from the Pontious Pilate conscious which is yearning for the truth yet would not recognize Christ truth even if it tripped up over them. Laugh

Yet once you have become familiar with what the vibration of Christ Truth feels like, it is easy to become trapped in the Peter pitfall which I believe can take two forms - the first is where you refuse to let go of your old identity, the second is where you refuse to accept your new one. In the first case the Being will refuse to let go of it's purely earth based identity of being right among men and will be prone therefore to use it's higher Christ knowledge to set itself up as an authority *over* others on earth. In the other case the Being is happy to throw away it's old identity but instead of accepting it's new unique higher identity it becomes a faithful duplicate of the messenger. It can even reach a very sophisticated intellectual understanding of the teaching brought forth through a Christed messenger, yet never brings forth anything higher or new. Both of these states are actually the same state, that of wanting to keep ascention at a distance, as a purely intellectual concept rather than going one step further and actually BEING. At a deeper level, Peter Consciousness actually springs from FEAR - either fear of the unknown, or the fear of making a mistake: denying the Christ within you, which is really just inner doubt.

Anyone who has read The Secret Doctrine by Helena Blavatsky (Peter) will know that he/she has an extremely good intellectual understanding of the inner workings of the universe and even the ascention process, and I admit I was a bit suprised to find out such a person has not yet ascended. Now I know why - holding the KEYS to the kingdom of God is all fine and dandy but to enter the ascention spiral you have to actually take the plunge and use those keys to open the door! Laugh

It's the very same reason why some people have shelves full of self-help books but they never seem to do them any good - because they haven't internalized them, so it's just dead men's bones. What a (non) coincidence that the Bascillica in Rome depicts a DEAD christ and a statue of Peter - perpetually holding those keys, frozen in time. (The Catholic Church since Peter has further deteriorated so that it no longer even has the keys, but the catalyst that allowed this to happen is enough people denying the reality of their own Christ potential.)

Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 9:51 pm Post subject:

Hi Anne,

As I read your post it occurred to me that time and again I've been coming back to the importance of Astrea's dictation:

http://www.askrealjesus.com/Q_PathChristhood/ACCUSER/Astrea121709.html

It is certainly as you say - the "Peter pitfall" manifests in 2 forms, which I suppose are two sides of the same coin, namely:
1. not wanting to let the old die
2. not wanting to accept the new

Both of the above are the products of fear and all particular fears can eventually be traced back to the introduction of the energy of accusation as explained by Astrea.

The Peter consciousness is just one of many ego-constructs that derive ultimately from the energy of accusation.

Fear of the unknown - why, ultimately, would we be afraid of the unknown? Why might the unknown threaten us? Surely it is because the Conscious You provides us with the memory that their is no need for anything to be unknown... that it is possible to be All-knowing. If therefore we are keenly aware of our finitude in embodiment, the combination of the energy of accusation and the limited perception we accept as reality cause us to be afraid that we are unworthy.

Fear of making a mistake is the same but with the idea that we might possibly become unworthy.

Yet we are worthy simply by virtue of our existence.

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:29 am Post subject:

Hi John, Hi Ann,

I think the Peter consciouisness is about the 2nd challenge of Christ, meaning that the ego will not let go and tries to fit the Christ into one's mental box although it sees that it is indeed the Christ, being the First Challenge.

This may show in fear, but only at a 2nd level because first it believes that Christ must behave such and such. If it doesn't do it, it wants to make it fit into it.
If this cannot be done, it goes into denial or fear because it cannot live up to it or fears to loose something that the ego is holding on to.

What you mentioned about the 2 manifestations of the pitfall that you mentioned is true, too, however, it is always true Smile

, because any step on the ascending spiral is a letting go of the old and an acceptance of the new, I think it is not limited to this particular step only.

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 2:57 am Post subject:

It just occured to me the the suppression of women that the masters have been talking about so much lately is actually just another expression of the energy of the accuser.

There are two main ways to reacting to the energy of accusation (aside from the higher way of remaining non-attached): The masculine alpha way seeks to deflect the accusation away from itself by joining in with the accusers. The omega feminine reaction manifests as feelings of guilt, of being impure or feeling never good enough.

In the physical plane this translates (roughly) into men and women and men's anger against women and women falling into the trap of feeling guilty or inferior.

I realize now this energy had been affecting me a lot for most of my life, but since I'm less identified with my outer gender than most people (never really considered myself a 'woman' somehow) it had taken on a more subtle, complex form.

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 3:20 am Post subject:

Hi Anne,

Yes, by all means, the accuser is a hater that believes and acts in duality, believing that separating from the opposite of good can help him to become a better person.

The more we do, the less we are capable to transcend duality because we are engaged/attached to our self chosen calling of perpetuating separation.

So the answer is only Love, being the contrary, the unifying force that integrates and as a result takes us out of duality.

And this is a very subtle trap that most people have been tricked in. We believe that we attract what we Love and we reject what we hate.

But that is not correct, because as long as we abide in duality we cannot truly separate one from the other because we cannot hate something and not create it.
The crucial point about this is that we are co-creators and as co-creators we sustain and create all things we are having our attention upon. So we cannot hate and not sustain the very condition we hate at the same time.

What we do when we accuse/hate is that we lower our vibration and we go into greater separation because we fail to see ONEness because we believe it is not good to be one with all things.
So by hate or even mild dislike, we walk away from God and sustain the permanency of the object of our hate.

When we love, we walk out of duality into union with God.

In the end, we not only Love but we are Love itself, being part of it as it begins to express through us, as we even ask for its presence within us in order to give it out in the process of its flowing through us.